Teens in vehicles with monitoring devices took fewer risks while driving than unsupervised teens, according to a 2009 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study of 16- and 17-year-old drivers. Speeding, something that can be monitored and in some cases prevented with technology, was a factor in 33% of fatal teen crashes in 2011, the Governors Highway Safety Association reported last month. Teen crash deaths have declined in recent years, but an average of seven teens a day still die in car crashes. And there are a growing number of phone apps and aftermarket devices for parental controls. New cars increasingly have available technology that lets parents both spy on and set limits for their kids behind the wheel. He says he will use "every piece of technology" he can to monitor them, including while they're driving. Rob Coker says safety is why he keeps electronic tabs on his daughters, which he does now through the "Find My iPhone" app.
"I would feel like it's more of a safety thing for them," she says. If she didn't know, "It would be more of a trust thing than anything for me." Grayson, 14, won't be driving for a couple of years, but she thinks she'll be fine with monitoring. The Coker sisters of Marietta, Ga., say they don't mind if their parents electronically monitor their driving, as long as it's done for the right reasons and it's not done secretly.Īshley, 17, knows her father is tracking her, so she says it's OK.
#Best teen driving log app for android how to#
Now, following three appointments made by then-President Donald Trump, the court has six conservative and three liberal justices.Watch Video: How to monitor teens at the wheel The Supreme Court ruled on the baker case before the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who voted in favor of LGBTQ rights in key cases. Smith, like Phillips before her, is represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group, which has had success arguing religious rights cases at the Supreme Court in recent years. Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson wrote that there is a long tradition of public accommodations laws protecting the ability of all people to obtain goods and services. State officials said in court papers that they had never investigated Smith and had no evidence that anyone had ever asked her to create a website for a same-sex wedding.
The court ruled then that the baker, Jack Phillips, did not receive a fair hearing before the state Civil Rights Commission because there was evidence of anti-religious bias. The case gave the court a second bite at a legal question it considered but never resolved when it ruled in a similar case in 2018 in favor of a Christian baker, also from Colorado, who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple. In particular, this court has held, public accommodations statutes can sweep too broadly when deployed to compel speech," he added. "At the same time, this court has also recognized that no public accommodation law is immune from the demands of the Constitution. Gorsuch, who wrote a 2020 ruling that expanded LGBTQ rights in an employment context, said that public accommodation laws play a vital role in protecting individual civil rights.
#Best teen driving log app for android free#
"The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place, where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the court. Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Christian graphic artist and website designer Lorie Smith speaks to supporters outside the Supreme Court, on Dec. The remaining 21 states do not have laws explicitly protecting LGBTQ rights in public accommodations, although some local municipalities do. The ruling could allow other owners of similar creative businesses to evade punishment under laws in 29 states that protect LGBTQ rights in public accommodations in some form.
0 kommentar(er)
